There is a pattern to be found with the Obama administration’s desire to disarm Americans. Whether it is the 2009 Fast and Furious plan, which will forever be a stain on the history of this republic, or using a mentally deranged man’s murder of innocent children, dead bodies are seen as a vehicle to be used to advance their agenda.

For decades the Left has called for attacks on our 2nd Amendment. They wish to label American gun owners and even believers in the Constitutional rights, as lunatics and extremists. Years ago Eric Holder called for the same successful extreme propaganda campaign used to demonize law abiding cigarette smokers, to be used against law abiding gun owners. Eric Holder said that gun owners should be made to ‘cower’. These radical Leftist ideas must be exposed and understood.

When then Senator Obama was on the campaign trail for his presidential bid, he gave prepared statements that he supported the Constitutional right to bear arms. Once elected, one of his first missions was demonizing legal gun owners.

In the first four months of the Obama administration, President Obama visited Mexico and blamed the United States 2nd Amendment for the violence in Mexico. He proclaimed that the majority of weapons used in Mexican crime came from the United States. This statement was fiction, not fact, yet he also sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder to Mexico to make similar false statements and blame. As the inconvenient truth that less  of the weapons that could be traced, which was a small percentage of the weapons seized, actually came from the United States became well know, they devised a plan to change the numbers.

A few months later they implemented a plan known as Fast and Furious. The plan was for the ATF to purchase military grade weapons with tax payer dollars and get them to the straw buyers for the Mexican drug gangs. To achieve this goal, they lied to law abiding gun store owners, telling them that it was part of a plan to sell guns to straw buyers in order to track the weapons to killers on the other side of the border. These blatant lies gave the gun store owners the idea that they were doing something to help, rather than hurt, their Mexican neighbors.

This plan was not designed to stop violence in Mexico by tracking guns and making arrests. Fast and Furious was designed for the ultimate goal of flooding Mexico with over 2000 military grade weapons which would enable and assist the Mexican drug gangs to carry on their criminal enterprises with increased fire-power. They believed that the top-secret plan would allow them to increase the percentage of arms found at crimes scenes that could be easily traced back to the United States. And indeed, it was highly successful from their point of view. Bodies have piled up across the border with over 200 murders to date having been committed with military grade weapons provided to the Mexican drug gangs through the Fast and Furious plan.

Though many agents in the ATF objected to the Fast and Furious plan within the confines of the agency, their voices of reason were silenced. That changed when Border Agent Brian Terry was brutally murdered by a Mexican drug gang and weapons recovered at the murder scene were found to be part of the 2000 weapons that the ATF provided the criminals. Border Agent Brian Terry’s death emboldened patriotic Americans in the ranks of the ATF to come forward. These heroic public servants put their country above self and informed Senator Grassley of the murderous plan. The courageous actions of these ATF agents lifted the veil on the illegal, heinous plan to attack our 2nd Amendment by putting guns in the hands of murderers.

Though hundreds of innocent men, women and children were murdered with Fast and Furious weapons, no one involved in the implementation of the plan has been charged with a crime.

Given these facts, it is no surprise that the Left jumped on the opportunity to once again attack our 2nd Amendment rights using the murder of innocents at Sandy Hook to promote their agenda.

The goal of the Left is to disarm America, whether using the actions of a mentally ill killer who stole the weapons he used, or arming murderous drug gangs to produce bodies. 

        Is there ever any reasonable person who honestly believes that graphic child rape, graphic homosexual rape and even bestiality should be on a middle school’s recommended reading list for 12 year olds? Well, everyone from the Fairhaven middle school librarian, who believes that her Master’s degree outweighs parental concerns on the issue, to the Superintendent of Fairhaven, MA. public schools, believes that they have the right to expose young students to pornography of every depraved sort.

Parents in Fairhaven, MA have taken the time to read many of the selections and have spoken to the town’s deaf ears.

When parents took the matter to the Fairhaven, MA school committee, the body in charge of overseeing educators, their concerns were dismissed.

“We are not in the business of censorship,” Pam Kuechler, the committee’s chairwoman said. “We trust our teachers.”

The parents attending the meeting were aghast. Many parents asked, what’s next? If the school committee believes that recommending 12 year olds fill their summer days by reading about violent sex acts in order that they can write a report on it for their teachers, what’s next? Where will it go from here?

Though many parents are extremely upset about the actions and reactions by the people in charge of their children’s education, they are afraid to speak out given the rigid reaction by the Fairhaven, MA School Superintendent, School Committee members and Middle School Principal. 

Even the local newspaper saw fit to print their own opinion piece on the pornography push by the school system titled, Courage In Fairhaven- School Committee defends local teachers.

The Fairhaven, MA school system stands by their desire to introduce 12 yr. olds to images of violent homosexual teen rape, heterosexual teen rape, incest, and bestiality by way of recommended reading lists.The middle school librarian explained her position by saying that the books contain things that students, like the only boy speaking at the meeting, can relate to and learn from. Many parents who attended that meeting found it odd that the boy wasn’t accompanied by his parents to the school committee meeting. They had their answers when the meeting was over and the middle school student got into the librarian’s car.

The people involved in putting the Fairhaven, MA middle school reading lists together obviously have an agenda. The problem is that the superintendent, principal, school committee members, teachers and school librarian haven’t taken into account the troubled students in the middle school. Fairhaven, MA schools have had to deal with sexual assaults in the past, not just in the high school but in an elementary school in recent years. The young perpetrators of these sexual assaults might be emboldened by the school’s sanctioning of these books under the cover of education.

It’s time for parents across the country to take a good hard look at their school’s recommended reading lists. Months into the school year and students in Fairhaven are still trying to figure out who the teachers are that read and recommended the disgusting books. No longer can parents assume that everything on a school’s recommended reading list will expand their minds in a positive way.

The question remains, why are schools putting raunchy porn on recommended reading lists for 12 yr. olds.

Click on link below for more on the subject.

http://wbsm.com/controversial-summer-reading-list-discussed/

What is behind the desire on the far left to raise taxes on so-called rich? Who will really be impacted? How will their socialist causes of big government and fundamentally transforming our great Republic, benefit from higher taxes? These are the questions we need to answer.

The left says, tax the rich. Will the rich be impacted if the Democrats are allowed to raise taxes as they desire? Of course, however, those business owners will pull back on plans for company expansion and that will stop new hiring. 

Many feel that the real target is the American family farm and associated businesses. If the Democrats plan succeeds, the Death Tax will rise from 15% to 55%. Small business owners and family farmers’ life’s work will be destroyed by the Democrats in government as surviving family members will be forced to sell off assets just to pay the outrageous taxes.

How would this benefit the socialist/big government agenda? The government would have to find a way to fill the void of both family farms and small business. The left knows that it can’t, by law, confiscate the farm land and small business outright. The country wouldn’t stand for such lawlessness. Raising the Death Tax to 55% achieves the same goal. Losing family farms will naturally cause the price of food of all sorts to rise.

When business owners are under attack they naturally plan carefully. Just the idea that the Democrats want to raise their taxes in a horrible economy has business owners idling in neutral. That benefits the left with a slow economy that they can claim to want to fix with the higher taxes. It’s a harmful circle.

Many feel that there is a cultural reason for the left to target family centered businesses. Often farms and small businesses are generations old. They are guided by American traditions and values, strong family bonds, lasting marriages and often religious, all of which goes against the socialist dreams of fundamental transformation on the societal level.

The left has taken a heinous, costly step forward in their plan to destroy Americana. There are many reasons to oppose the high taxes being proposed, the most important of which is that we can’t afford to allow the destruction of our economy to continue. The priority for the right must be to hammer home the point that Democrats’ lavish wasteful spending brought us into this debt and we must cut it off at the knees in a serious way. Conservatives must insist that spending be brought under control and that any and all tax increases be debated and voted on individually.

There are many questions that need to be answered about how and why the Democrats what to raise taxes and what impact they expect, in detail, as a result. This can be achieved with debate on the House and Senate floors.

          Many have asked why I wrote The Eagle’s Claw, my first political thriller as my first two novels don’t contain a hint of politics. The question revolves around a simple, what if. I enjoy reading about different times in American history and as I became familiar with the socialist movements both in this country and different parts of the world, it came to me.

What if the socialist movement succeeded in this country? What if every ambition of the global socialist movement was about to be realized? What if, at last, the sleeping giant awakened and demanded a return to the freedom that our Constitution guarantees?

The Eagle’s Claw begins after twelve years of total government control in a transformed United States of America.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1478200472/ref=cm_sw_r_fa_alp_qrAwqb0N917J8

Parents were demonized by a local newspaper for standing up for their children. Three parents went to the school committee and voiced their objection to a summer reading list that included novels which contained graphic sex and bestiality. The recommended 24 titles were touted as having something for everyone. They weren’t whistling Dixie. 

One parent collected 198 signatures on a petition requesting that the parents be given the list earlier in the year, rather than at the end of the year. Making the change would allow interested parents ample time to weed out the obscene before their children chose a title. These three parents stood alone to voice their disappointment at there being extremely offensive novels on the summer reading list. They were stunned that such filth as graphic accounts of homosexual anal sex, sexual assaults and bestiality would be recommended reading to 12 + 13 yr. old children by a panel of teachers and administrators.

The result of the parents’ efforts, the school committee stands by the list and the timing of its release and stands by the titles, filth included.

The voices of 3 parents caused many to stop and think about where they’d put their trust. It was a hot topic on local radio with both sides speaking out. The most ironic thing about the radio spots were the fact that one DJ told the audience that the novels in question were too graphic to read on air! Yet the school stands behind the filth, brushing off objections, telling parents to ‘take their blinders off’and waving their Masters degrees as license to recommend filth to any age! 

The local paper let their voice be heard with an editorial that calls the parents brave enough to show up and interested enough in their children’s education to speak up, bullies! 

You decide. Should novels that contain graphic sex and bestiality be on a middle school recommended summer reading list for children 12 + 13 yrs old going from the 7th to the 8th grade?  

http://fun107.com/fairhavens-8th-grade-summer-reading-list-controversy-poll/

http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120916/OPINION/209160368

http://wbsm.com/controversial-summer-reading-list-discussed/

On 9-11-12 two of America’s Embassies one in Egypt and one in Libya were attacked. Today the President addressed the nation and in the five plus minute statement, President Obama never uttered one word about the attack on our Embassy in Egypt. This omission was deliberate. Though there was no loss of life at the Embassy in Egypt, it was in fact attacked. 

At the Embassy in Egypt, the walls of the Embassy was breached, our American Flag was torn down and ripped apart, then replaced with the terrorists flag.

Several minutes after the attack began on the American Embassy in Egypt, our Embassy in Libya was attacked. Four Americans were murdered. The Embassy was overrun, looted and set ablaze.

Both attacks should have been addressed by President Obama this morning.

Think US votes in 2012 will be tallied in US? Think again.

by Jacque’ Stoddard on 04/09/12

     While the DOJ stirs things up and fights the Voter ID laws in the states, many ask if its all for show. Could this all be another smokescreen for the real outrage?

     Stalin had one thing right when he said that it doesn’t matter who votes, but who COUNTS the votes. In America we understand the value of clean elections. We have poll watchers and procedures in place to protect the honesty of the tabulation of our elections. Many states have Voter ID laws and others are trying to put them in place.

     In Jan. 2012 an important merger occured. SOE the US internet voting company involved in tabulating elections in 525 US juristion merged with SCYTL. SCYTL is involved in tallying elections in several countries around the globe. The company is based in Barcelona, Spain.

     What this means to voters in America is that our votes will be tabulated by a foriegn company. This cannot be allowed to happen. This country was filled with doubt about our election process with all of the arrest and convictions stemming from voter fraud in 2008. Our leaders on both sides must put a stop to a foreign company counting votes and putting out results. Our election process is the only way citizens have to protect our Republic.

     SCYTL is funded by venture capital including Spinnaker Capital which was a huge donor to Obama’s inauguration fund. It is not that there would be inpropriety, but the country, weary from actual fraud, would not be served by even the hint of it.

   If you are bothered by the idea of the US 2012 election being tallied in Europe let your congressmen know how you feel. Getting the word out and raising our voices is the one way to stop this beofre it happens.

     Call your congressmen and tell them that if they think the voters are okay with US votes being tallied in Europe, they need to think again.

Global elitists have been peeved by the way Americans hold on to their independence and sovereignty. The global socialists have been plotting and planning many ways to destroy America’s way of life through proposed United Nations Treaties and they have been met with varying degrees of resistance.

The most successful effort by far has been UN Agenda 21 which has already been implemented in hundreds of communities around the globe, including the U.S.A. UN Agenda 21 has used the ICLEI sustainability and its ‘save the earth’ green cover to fool many county and city leaders.

Other efforts have been blocked by the loud outrage of Americans who quickly saw the plans and treaties as a clear attack on our Republic. Cap and Tax was a global redistribution of wealth plan and was soundly defeated in Congress. Law of the Sea Treaty was recently shelved when the truth came out about the harm it would do to our sovereignty.  What the elitists showed us is their strong will to defeat the country by surrendering to the global will.

In this political season, many are being reminded of President Obama’s promises to bankrupt the coal industry as many coal plants are forced to shut down by his administration. The attention to his promise that the cost of energy would necessarily skyrocket is an important focus.

What does need more exposure is the threat to our sovereignty and financial freedom by way of a proposed global currency. Even more troubling is the fact that U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner stated in 2009 that the Obama administration would be open to a global currency run by the IMF in a second term. This statement caused a shock wave in the financial market world wide. Not surprising, this outrageous statement wasn’t given due attention by the U.S. mainstream media. Though the international shock did cause Geithner to walk back his comments. This is another ‘flexibility’ issue that Americans should be concerned with.

Global currency would bring few countries financial situation up but, would most certainly bring America’s economy down to a level never imagined. The elitists say that a global currency, much like all other UN plans, would only allow for a governance panel, not a global government. The idea is laughable. If the IMF was able to redistribute the wealth by way of global currency, it would crush and destroy completely America’s Republic.

Giving up our US currency can not be an option. The time to ask candidates for every office what their stance on this issue is, has arrived. 

  It struck a cord with most Americans when President Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and others on the left came out and supported the Occupy Wall Street protests. The same cast and crew that spewed acid or simply dismissed the law abiding Tea Party groups, glowed with praise when the well planned anti-American occupations began.

  Where did these occupiers come from? By now most understand that this is a movement designed and financed by those who want the United States of America to become a sniffling, groveling, socialist eye sore. The left is such a small percentage of Americans, they couldn’t have made this happen without the help of teacher’s unions, teachers, professors, colleges and parents.

  I have never seen such an interest in American government by my children as I have the last few years. The education that they’ve received at home has led them to notice the oddities occurring in our country. Their knowledge has caused them to challenge their teachers, yet always in a respectful way.

  A few weeks ago my daughter’s eighth grade history teacher was reading from the textbook. He said that China was a capitalist country. My daughter raised her hand and said that the statement was false. When the teacher pointed and said he had to teach what was in the textbook, my daughter was stunned and disappointed.

  She challenged him and asked him directly if he knew that the fact was that China is a communist country? Before he could answer she asked if he knew about Mao the communist leader starving millions of Chinese people. And then she asked if it was his responsibility to teach the students the facts. The teacher looked down at the floor and the class was silent for what seemed like forever to my teenage daughter. 

  The teacher took a deep breath and looked at her. He explained to the class that the text was a bit off target. He admitted that China is a communist country and then explained that the authors of the textbook were anticipating China becoming a free capitalist society. He put down the book and went on to other subjects. After the class, a few students thanked her for speaking up and the teacher asked for a word with her in private. He asked her where she’d learned about China and she said, at home. 

  Her experience illustrates my point. The teachers teach from the textbooks. The textbooks are written by the professors. Our children are being indoctrinated into a progressive agenda earlier than ever. I’ve seen colleges in my area offering exciting courses on going green, social justice and sustainability, and the possibility of getting a Government grant. All to promote a socialist agenda.

  We send our children to college to broaden their minds. We struggle to save money to assist them as they get their education and hope for a bright future for them as a result.

  Today we have people on the left like Elizabeth Warren proudly taking credit for teaching the occupiers. Parents need to take notice of what is being taught in every level of the education of their children, especially when it comes to paying for people like Warren to corrupt the minds of our youth.  

  The draw of the ‘he’s electable’ statement brings many to choose the slick politician. It worked well in the 2008 primary. Now, let’s think for a minute about how the ‘08 campaign would have been different if the ticket had been Palin-McCain. Stay with me, this is important. McCain was propped up by the same media during the primary that eventually helped Obama win the general election. McCain wanted to avoid controversy by not talking about the hate filled rants against America by the so-called pastor at Obama’s church. That was probably the biggest mistake of the campaign. The media hushed up the facts about Obama from day one, but the candidate had the power to bring the facts into the sunshine or stuff them under the carpet. The candidate made the wrong choice. It is my humble opinion that had the outsider, rather than the career politician, been in the driver’s seat she would have called Obama out on each and every red flag.

  Out of a field of many conservatives running, McCain was called electable. McCain is a war hero to be respected for his service to this great country. He was also the polished politician. The electable title stuck and so, he became our nominee, but not our President.

  This primary is far too important to fall for the electable line put out by the powers that be. If you like a conservative candidate who you can relate to work to get that person as the nominee. We the people, must have more faith in our judgement than the heads of a party or the talking heads of the media.

  Some people moan that the Republican Candidates have been in too many debates. I feel great about it. Everyone of us has a bad day and a day we shine. We learn more about each candidate with every appearance if we watch with an open mind. Debates are an important part of our free Republic.

  One example of something very important that I learned in the 2008 election cycle, I learned during a Clinton-Obama debate. She stood at the podium, looked into the camera and said she was a proud member of the Modern Progressive Party. I knew she was a liberal Democrat, but until that moment I had no idea that she was a socialist.

  When Ronald Reagan was running for President they called him a bumbling cowboy. They said he was not electable all the way through the primary and into the general election. The American people didn’t listen to the elite, they saw a man who they could relate to. They looked beyond his missteps and focused on his views, beliefs and heartfelt message. They chose a man who represented a vision of America that they could believe in to bring the country out from under the dark cloud that the Carter administration had cast across this great land.

  The bumbling cowboy turned out to be one of our greatest Presidents. President Ronald Reagan will be a man admired for generations to come because the American people chose wisely.

  We do not need an Obama lite. We don’t need another slick politician.